| |
UN: US has 'Legal Obligation' for Funds01/09 06:15
NEW YORK (AP) -- The top United Nations official on Thursday said the United
States has a "legal obligation" to keep paying its dues that fund U.N. agencies
after the White House announced that it is withdrawing support from more than
30 initiatives operated by the world body.
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he regretted President Donald
Trump's decision to withdraw from 31 U.N.-related agencies, including the
U.N.'s population agency and the U.N. treaty that establishes international
climate negotiations. The U.S. will also depart from dozens of other global
organizations or initiatives not affiliated with the U.N.
"As we have consistently underscored, assessed contributions to the United
Nations regular budget and peacekeeping budget, as approved by the General
Assembly, are a legal obligation under the UN Charter for all Member States,
including the United States," Stephane Dujarric, a spokesperson for Guterres,
said in a statement.
He added that despite the announcement, the U.N. entities targeted will keep
doing their work: "The United Nations has a responsibility to deliver for those
who depend on us."
The strong retort from the U.N. comes after the world body has spent the
better part of the past year in a somewhat hostile and fragile back-and-forth
with U.S. officials, who, after Trump's return to office, zeroed in on
eliminating billions of dollars in aid and funding to international
organizations like the U.N. and humanitarian assistance at large.
Through many conciliatory public and closed-door appeals, U.N. officials,
including Guterres, had been able to convince Trump and his allies not to
completely abandon the institution the U.S. helped found on the ashes of World
War II, including through a $2 billion agreement for humanitarian assistance
announced last month. But America's retreat had already influenced other
Western countries, including France and the U.K., to reevaluate humanitarian
funding, with many shifting that money toward military spending.
But Wednesday's announcement surprised diplomats at the highest levels of
the U.N., who said they learned about the withdrawal through news reports and
the White House social media. There has been no formal communication from the
Trump administration outlining the decision, Dujarric told reporters.
Many U.N. officials refused to comment on the impact it would have on their
agencies because they had not been given details or official word from anyone
in the U.S. government.
Trump's executive order
Following a yearlong review of participation in and funding for all
international organizations, Trump signed an executive order suspending
American support for 66 groups, agencies and commissions.
Many of the targets are U.N.-related agencies, commissions and advisory
panels that focus on climate, labor, migration and other issues the Trump
administration has categorized as catering to diversity and "woke" initiatives.
The administration previously suspended support for the World Health
Organization, the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees known as UNRWA, the U.N.
Human Rights Council and the U.N. cultural agency UNESCO. It has taken a
larger, la carte approach to paying dues to the world body, picking which
operations and agencies it believes align with Trump's agenda and those that no
longer serve U.S. interests.
Some of the agencies impacted, including the U.N. Population Fund, an
organization that provides sexual and reproductive health services worldwide,
have long been a lightning rod for Republican opposition, and Trump cut funding
for it during his first term.
The withdrawal from the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, or
UNFCCC, came as less of a surprise as Trump and his allies had previously
withdrawn U.S. support from other climate initiatives.
The 1992 agreement between 198 countries to financially support climate
change activities in developing countries is the underlying treaty for the
landmark Paris climate agreement. Trump withdrew from that agreement soon after
returning to the White House.
Simon Stiell, UNFCCC executive secretary, warned the U.S. that the decision
to pull back will harm "the US economy, jobs and living standards, as
wildfires, floods, mega-storms and droughts get rapidly worse."
"The doors remain open for the U.S. to reenter in the future, as it has in
the past with the Paris Agreement," he said in a statement. "Meanwhile, the
size of the commercial opportunity in clean energy, climate resilience, and
advanced electrotech remains too big for American investors and businesses to
ignore."
The US contribution to the UN budget
The U.N.'s regular budget, which finances its day-to-day operations and
primary activities, is funded by its 193 member nations, each paying a
percentage based on the size of their economy. The U.S., the world's largest
economy, is supposed to pay 22%, followed by China, with 20%. There is a
separate budget to fund the U.N.'s peacekeeping operations, where the U.S. is
required to pay 25%.
U.N. officials said the U.S. did not pay its annual contributions to the
regular budget last year, an obligation outlined in the U.N. Charter. A member
that is in arrears for two full years loses its vote in the General Assembly.
"The charter is not la carte," Dujarric said. "We're not going to
renegotiate the charter."
All four other veto-wielding permanent members of the U.N. Security Council
-- China, France, Russia and the U.K. -- have paid in full. China paid over
$685 million.
|
|
